Said she would support the bill. Battlefords—LloydminsterSK. April 4: Said that the union of one man and one woman is at the "root of all humanity". Said gays and lesbians have the right to form a relationship, but "do not have a right to rip open the institution of marriage and call it their own.
In effect, this court ruling outlaws public expression of biblical teaching against homosexual acts. Firstly, since his riding is in Quebec, his constituents would most certainly not same sex marriage articles pdf editor in Whitby opposed or at least not overwhelmingly. February During 2nd reading debate, Asselin said because you're born with a mother and father, it is questionable how family values can develop from same sex marriage articles pdf editor in Whitby married gay couple.
To learn about each other, to accept difference, to give the same chance to others to live their lives as we would like them to give to us. April 4: During 2nd reading, he stated that marriage is a time-honoured institution that has stood the test of time and is a same sex marriage articles pdf editor in Whitby foundation of how our society has been built.
Said 8 courts have stated the traditional definition is in violation of the Charter. The 2nd reading vote came up on a recorded division, and passed — March During 2nd reading debate of the bill, he referenced Section 46 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to defend his position.
That is an argument that we are hearing from all religions and all denominations. Said he would vote against.
Believes human rights have nothing to do with the word "marriage" Globe and Mail February 1, survey indicated he would vote against. Harper introduced an amendment which was defeated on April 12, — John Cummins. February Presented several petitions against the bill, and is one of the most right-winged conservatives in the caucus.
Voted against. February During 2nd reading debate in the House, he said that his constituents feel that it is wrong that the courts have been involved in defining marriage. It was included to allow those who wished to argue that position to do so.
Say goodbye to freedom of the press, Canada!