Retrieved 15 August The book attracted widespread academic and popular attention on publication. Become a Member Start earning points for buying books! We have not been reflecting accurately on the same sex relationships of our past.
Boswell appends a number of said documents, in the original languages AND in translations. The information here was invaluable and captivating, demonstrating among many other things that there is amply ancient evidence of people with lifelong partnerships and marriages to lovers of the same sex same sex unions in pre-modern europe john boswell in Lafayette this time.
Amazon Renewed Like-new products you can trust. Briefly dismissing Boswell's work as unsuccessful at placing his interpretations within the "customs, language, and theology" of the time, he urges the reader to read Brent D. Don't be fooled by the title! Past historians encountering these manuscripts have usually interpreted the same-sex ceremonies as honoring a spiritual bond or friendship, rather than a marriage equivalent.
May 30, ISBN Dec 27, Scott Williams rated it really liked it. Although largely positive of it, she thought that Boswell's choice of the term "same-sex union" was unsuccessful, because in its same sex unions in pre-modern europe john boswell in Lafayette it became a "transparent euphemism" for "homosexual marriage", the very term that Boswell sought to avoid.
A fascinating work of compelling, erudite scholarship. While the author is mostly interested in same-sex marriages the entire first half of the book is necessarily dedicated to an exploration of the origins of marriage in general.
And to that I say, Amen. Welcome back.
As far as I could tell from a light bit of googling, one of his contemporaries challenged a key part of Boswell's interpretation, and Boswell acknowledged that his peer might have a point but that he believed the overall premise of the book still stands.
It's exactly how I want to feel when I walk away from reading a nonfiction book which presents new information about our world, info which is meticulously detailed, outlined, and footnoted like this. Records of ceremonies i It is a difficult read. Maintaining that all of the Church blessings between two men described in the book were ceremonies of "spiritual brotherhood" and not of "same-sex unions", she highlighted the law codes that prohibited same-sex sexual activity during this period, information she claims Boswell ignored.
I seem to remember near the end of his life that Boswell made some sort of admission or correction concerning his research, but can't find anything about it, so maybe wrong about that.