They also say the curriculum will teach kids how to be accepting and respectful of people who have a different sexual orientation or gender. One board trustee said he believes a majority of parents want sexual education to be taught to their children, but the issue came down to what specifically should be discussed in the classroom.
Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office 6 hours ago.
Some parents had objected to specific teachings, like one in the grade six curriculum that detailed a couple who are dating and making out: The boy lifts up the girls shirt to touch her breast. While California is one of only three states that requires sex laszloffy sex education in Fremont programs present laszloffy sex education in Fremont as an option for navigating unplanned pregnancy, the implementation of this forward-thinking curriculum continues to face resistance.
Parents and students at a Fremont school board meeting debating sex ed on Wednesday, May 2, Critics claim the newly mandated sex education programs sexualize children by exposing them to information about sex, STIs and HIV beginning in fourth grade. For more information, call Ric Shimshock at Your support is essential to maintaining this coverage.
Fremont, like other Silicon Valley suburbs, is an ethnoburb. No matter laszloffy sex education in Fremont cultural heritage, all kids now live in the age of the internet, just a click away from porn. He is also the founder of The Empathy Alliance. Want the top daily stories delivered to your inbox?
Fremont Unified Superintendent, Dr. She described her daughter as always wanting to try the experiments she learns in science class at home. Image 1 of 5.
Your support is essential to maintaining this coverage. Supporters of the 3Rs say it provides children with more information so they can make better choices involving consent and their sexual health. One parent thought the proposed discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity could erode family values.
Skip to content. Khan said she was also concerned by the spread of misinformation in the debate, including some more explicit imagery and language being presented as part of the lesson plan -- when it was suggested material for parents -- not children.