Report an error. Stephens told funeral homeowner Thomas Rost that following a vacation, she would report to work wearing a conservative skirt suit or dress that Mr. He concluded with a warning. Further, the long-standing legal understanding of liberty does not encompass the rights the majority opinion says it does, Thomas argued.
In ruling in favor of gay marriage, he said, "Five lawyers have closed the debate and enacted their own vision of marriage as a matter of constitutional law. Latest Issue Past Issues. And he maintained that the court had "short-circuit[ed]" the political process by not allowing states to define marriage for themselves, and he predicted the majority's decision alitos dissent on same sex marriage in Crawley have "potentially ruinous consequences for religious liberty.
Thomas interpreted "liberty" in the due process clause of the 14th Amendment as referring specifically to "freedom from restraint. During the Obama years, the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had changed its long-standing interpretation of civil rights law to include discrimination against LGBTQ people.
Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way.
In ruling in favor of gay marriage, he said, "Five lawyers have closed the debate and enacted their own vision of marriage as a matter of constitutional law. The outcome is expected to have a big impact for the estimated 8. His argument is that the concept of gay marriage is new and therefore not included.
The Print Edition. Roberts wrote that the majority's approach was "deeply disheartening," and he criticized what he considered to be its activism. Lauren Fox is a congressional reporter at U.
While he recognized the decision would be hailed as a major victory for same-sex couples and their allies, he also argued that they had been set back. While Roberts said he did not "begrudge" any of the celebrations that would follow the Court ruling, he had serious concerns that the Court had extended its role from constitutional enforcer to activist.
He delved into the history of marriage and wrote that other cases that had changed aspects of marriage - like the Loving case - but none until now had changed its core structure as being between a man and a woman. Chrome Safari Continue.
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Log In Create Free Account.